Spatial data and databases - aspects of legal protection

Małgorzata Gajos
Institute of Computer Science
University of Silesia
Będzińska 39
41-200 Sosnowiec
E - mail: gajos@us.edu.pl

Abstract

The notion of spacial information and main kinds of data processed in GIS systems have been widely described in the hereby paper (for instance geodesy information, infrastructural information, information concerning grounds, coalmines, information of geologic type etc.). The differentiation of the legal status of the data (for instance state or official secret, informational properties, personal data) has been stressed and the legal problems connected with the phenomena have been indicated, especially in reference to acquisition and access of the data.

At the final part of the paper, the problem of legal protection of databases has been taken into consideration, mainly the legal protection of databases in European Union on the base of Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union. The EU Directive offers protection to both - electronic and non-electronic databases and provides copyright and sui generis protection.Bases of protection of databases in Poland there is also describe. In Poland databases are protected mainly under legislation of 27th of July 2001 - protection of databases, which provide only sui generis protection and also as works under legislation of 4th of February 1994 - copyright and related rights.

As a result of research undertaken, it appears that introducing and functioning of GIS requires legal regulations of certain connected with this problems.

Keywords: spatial information, spatial data, legal protection of database, European Union directive, sui generis protection, copyright protection

The notion of spatial information

The range of the notion 'information about space' ('spatial information') contains legally determined, basic records of information, which include pieces of information contained in the state geodesy and cartographical supplies, real-estate register ,the register of grounds, buildings and flats, in spatial planning schedules, data bases of natural environment and to water planning and in plans of management of forests, in the collections of information from the range of the state - statistics, mining and management of minerals, defence, taxes and fees from possessing or using real-estate. However neither in rules nor in literature of the problem,the more precise or unified definition of this notion does not exist. It might be proved by nomenclature used by particular authors for defining systems of this information. Some of them use the notion 'systems of spatial information' (SIP) or a similar name 'systems of information about space', others speak about 'systems of geographical information' or about 'geographical systems of information' ('Geographical Information Systems' - GIS), yet others call it the information about ground ('land information') or about 'systems of local information' ('Land Information Systems' - LIS).

This results in far going differentiation of opinions on the content of spatial information, and the same - on the scope of systems of this information. There exists, for example, a distinct tendency restricting their range to traditionally conceived geodesy cartographical information. In wider range some geographical and geologic attributes of space are taken into account (eg scenery, natural environment, natural wealths). Yet wider is the idea of considering space as certain natural and socio-economical entity. Supporters of such opinion treat space as three-dimensional (cubic) structure, instead of flat (two-dimensional) and in consequence they tend to acknowledge that systems of spatial information should embrace data about all more important material objects, natural or created by men being found on a given area: on its surface, under the ground and in the air. They also affirm that theoretically it would be well-founded to include here also some information about social and economic infrastructure, eg about the industrial potential of a given region, about scientific cultural and educational institutions, about social organizations, about demographic situation. So understood system of spatial information is indeed a complex system of information about the specific territorial unit - a commune, an administrative district, province, region or the whole country.

Sources of spatial information

There exist also many forms and types of sources of spatial information such as:

Kinds and legal status of spatial data

For the purpose of the present elaboration wide understanding of spatial information was accepted, acknowledging that problem range of systems of this information embraces in prticular the following inquiry blocks:

In the range of making the spatial data available the general rule is freedom of inquiry processes, lack of prohibitions of using this information, and in certain cases even constraint of delivering the information (eg at general registers), however with reservation of protection of such legally protected goods, as:

If the problem is making the spatial information available to external subjects, then the decisive meaning should be attributed to such circumstances, as:

For circulation of spatial information, and the same for good SIP functioning, some legal implications of accumulation, transformation and of making the data available, resulting from current rules are essential. In Poland in the first place it is necessary to mention the law from 4 of February 1994 about copyright and related rights (Dz.U. No 24, item. 83 with later changes). In light of its rules the problems of SIP might be brought to four basic problems, namely:

Spatial databases

Current laws often impose the duty of creation and servicing of databases of SIP character. As an example one can mention:

The legal protection of databases under European Directive

The legal base of protection of databases in European Union is the Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11th of March 1996 on the legal protection of databases.

Directive covers databases defined as a collection of independent works, data or other materials arranged in a systematic or methodical way and individually accessible by electronic or other means (art. 1 paragraph 2 Directive).

The Directive provides:

I. copyright protection for the intellectual creation involved in the selection and arrangement of materials.

In accordance with this Directive, databases which, by reason of the selection or arrangement of their contents, constitute the author's own intellectual creation shall be protected as such by copyright. No other criteria shall be applied to determine their eligibility for that protection (art. 3 paragraph 1 Directive).

The author of a database shall be the natural person or group of natural persons who created the base or, where the legislation of the Member States so permits, the legal person designated as the rightholder by that legislation (art. 4 paragraph 1 Directive).

In respect of the expression of the database which is protectable by copyright, the author of a database shall have the exclusive right to carry out or to authorize (art. 5 Directive):

The performance by the lawful user of a database or of a copy thereof of any of the acts listed above which is necessary for the purposes of access to the contents of the databases and normal use of the contents by the lawful user shall not require the authorization of the author of the database. Where the lawful user is authorized to use only part of the database, this provision shall apply only to that part (art. 6 paragraph 1 Directive). Member States shall have the option of providing for limitations on the rights in the following cases (art. 6 paragraph 2 Directive):

II. sui generis (in latin means "of its own kind or class") protection for an investment (in human and technical resources and effort and energy) in the obtaining, verification or presentation of the contents of a database. Under this right there is no requirement for creativity or originality.

Member States shall provide for a right for the maker of a database which shows that there has been qualitatively and/or quantitatively a substantial investment in either the obtaining, verification or presentation of the contents to prevent extraction and/or re-utilization of the whole or of a substantial part, evaluated qualitatively and/or quantitatively, of the contents of that database (art. 7 paragraph 1 Directive). The right may be transferred, assigned or granted under contractual licence (art. 7 paragraph 3 Directive).

Extraction means the permanent or temporary transfer of all or a substantial part of the contents of a database to another medium by any means or in any form. Re-utilization means any form of making available to the public all or a substantial part of the contents of a database by the distribution of copies, by renting, by on-line or other forms of transmission. The first sale of a copy of a database within the Community by the rightholder or with his consent shall exhaust the right to control resale of that copy within the Community. Public lending is not an act of extraction or re-utilization (art. 7 paragraph 2 Directive).

The repeated and systematic extraction and/or re-utilization of insubstantial parts of the contents of the database implying acts which conflict with a normal exploitation of that database or which unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the maker of the database shall not be permitted (art. 7 paragraph 5 Directive).

The maker of a database which is made available to the public in whatever manner may not prevent a lawful user of the database from extracting and/or re-utilizing insubstantial parts of its contents, evaluated qualitatively and/or quantitatively, for any purposes whatsoever. Where the lawful user is authorized to extract and/or re-utilize only part of the database, this paragraph shall apply only to that part. He also may not perform acts which conflict with normal exploitation of the database or unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the maker of the database and may not cause prejudice to the holder of a copyright or related right in respect of the works or subject matter contained in the database (art. 8 paragraph 1 - 3 Directive).

Member States may stipulate that lawful users of a database which is made available to the public in whatever manner may, without the authorization of its maker, extract or re-utilize a substantial part of its contents (art. 9 Directive):

Term of protection for database runs from the date of completion of the making of the database. It shall expire fifteen years from the first of January of the year following the date of completion. In the case of a database which is made available to the public in whatever manner before expiry of the period provided for in paragraph 1, the term of protection by that right shall expire fifteen years from the first of January of the year following the date when the database was first made available to the public. Any substantial change, evaluated qualitatively or quantitatively, to the contents of a database, including any substantial change resulting from the accumulation of successive additions, deletions or alterations, which would result in the database being considered to be a substantial new investment, evaluated qualitatively or quantitatively, shall qualify the database resulting from that investment for its own term of protection (art. 10 paragraph 1 - 3 Directive).

The protection under the sui generis right shall apply to database whose makers or rightholders are nationals of a Member State or who have their habitual residence in the territory of the Community (art. 11 paragraph 1 Directive). Shall also apply to companies and firms formed in accordance with the law of a Member State and having their registered office, central administration or principal place of business within the Community; however, where such a company or firm has only its registered office in the territory of the Community, its operations must be genuinely linked on an ongoing basis with the economy of a Member State (art. 11 paragraph 2 Directive).

The legal protection of databases in Poland

Necessity to adapt Polish legislation to European Union requirements under protection of databases causes the introduction of legislation of 27th of July 2001 - protection of databases (Dz.U. No 128, item 1402), which entered into force on the 10th of November 2002. Before this law databases were protected in Poland under legislation of 4th of February 1994 - copyright and related rights (Dz.U. 2000 No 80, item 904 with later changes) only as a work.

The aim of Directive was to provide harmonized copyright protection and protection through a new specific sui generis right for databases. However Directive provides much greater protection of databases than in Polish regulations. It concerns the legal protection of databases in any form. In Poland the law from 2001 concerned only sui generis protection without databases which are works.

References

  1. Band J., Gowdy J.S.: Sui generis database protection. D-Lib Magazine 1997 No 6
  2. Białousz S.: Kształcenie w zakresie systemów informacji przestrzennej. Systemy informacji przestrzennej GIS w praktyce (Education in range of systems of spatial information. Systems of spatial information GIS in practice). Kraków 1997
  3. Davison M.: The legal protection of databases. Cambridge Studies in Intellectual Property Rights. Cambbridge 2003
  4. Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11th of March 1996 on the legal protection of databases. Official Journal L 77, 27.03.1996
  5. Dobiński A.: Prawne aspekty wdrażania i eksploatacji Systemów Informacji Geograficznej i Systemów Informacji o Terenie (Legal aspects of initiation and of exploitation Of systems Of information Geographical and Of systems Of information about Ground). [W:] Stan prawny informacji o przestrzeni (State of legal information about space). Part V. Ed. G. Szpor. Katowice: Silgis Center 1994
  6. Gaździcki J.: Systemy informacji przestrzennej (Systems of spatial information). Warszawa - Wrocław 1990
  7. Słownik definicji ustawowych obiektów SIP (Dictionary of definitions of legal SIP objects). Ed. G. Szpor. Katowice: Silgis Center 1997
  8. Szewc A.: Systemy informacji przestrzennej w świetle prawa autorskiego i wynalazczego. Informacja i informatyka w administracji publicznej. (Systems of spatial information in the light of copyright and inventive law. Information and computer science in public administration). Ed. G. Szpor. Katowice 1993
  9. Szewc. A., Jyż G.: Ochrona programów komputerowych, informacji i baz danych (Protection of computer programme, information and databases). Bytom 2001
  10. Szpor G.: Informacja w zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym. Zagadnienia administracyjno-prawne (Information in spatial planning. Administrative-legal problems). Katowice 1998
  11. Traple E., Baza danych jako przedmiot praw autorskich i prawa sui generis (Database as a subject of copyright and sui generis protection). [in] Nowe regulaje prawne w dziedzinie własności przemyłowej (New regulation in a subject of indutrial prtoperty). [Kielce 2001], pp. 125-134. Wynalazczość i Ochrona Własności Intelektualnej (Inventiveness and Protection of Intellectual Property) No 6
  12. Ustawa z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. o ochronie baz danych (Legislation of 27th of July 2001 - protection of databases). Dz.U. No 128, item. 1402